 |
Jackson Verdict Brings Division
Yesterday, in a court case which has gripped the USA and cost local taxpayers in the court's small Californian jurisdiction more than $2 million, singer Michael Jackson was found innocent of all child abuse charges brought against him.
Predictably with such a high profile case involving a major celebrity, public opinion remains divided on the outcome.
Two members of the jury panel have already shared publicly that they remain suspicious of Jackson's treatment of young boys who are allowed -- if not invited -- to sleep with him in his bed.
Yet, on the evidence put before them on the particular charges put before them, they found insufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The hyperbole of statements made on Jackson's official website, which liken his release to that of Nelson Mandela, was only matched by those made by some US media commentators in the lead up to the verdict.
Some, including former O.J. Simpson lawyer Robert Shapiro, predicted a definite conviction on at least some counts. Other lawyers-turned-pundits foresaw a guilt on all counts, and seemed personally hurt when the verdict went against them.
The defence team, led by celebrity lawyer Thomas Mesereau, and Jackson's family and friends, have predictably maintained his innocence throughout. He may be eccentric, they say, but that does not mean he is a child abuser.
Those who were convinced of Jackson's guilt have expressed alarm and have pledged to watch more carefully Jackson's behaviour around children.
In all the hooplah, one thing is certain. A jury of everyday people has, quietly and far from the public gaze, weighed the evidence put before them and arrived at a considered verdict.
It is a good thing, say some, that even in this media-intrusive age of Reality TV, trials like this can still be conducted outside the media forum.
Writing on this site, social commentator Mal Fletcher says: 'The whole affair – the media coverage, if not the trial itself – serves as yet another example of the hype surrounding modern celebrities and our obsession with fame.'
'In the wake of the Jackson trial-turned-media-circus,' he says, 'I think we would do well to pause and consider where this culture of celebrity may be leading us.'
'Celebrity distorts reality. How many lives has celebrity ruined?'
|
|
(For the full editorial on this site, click here.)
Keywords: Michael Jackson | Jackson verdict | court case | child abuse | Thomas Mesereau | culture of celebrity | celebrity | News | Mal Fletcher
|
 |
 |
Want to keep in touch with what Next Wave is doing each month? Enter your email address below.
|
 |
Mal Fletcher is amazing; you should hear him preach. It's incredible. He came to my church in Norwich, England and just blew us away.
Lazarus, UK
The strength of EDGES is that it explains it's argument in logical steps without the usual emotive language. If all the logical steps are present and correct, it is difficult to disagree with the point being made whether you are a Christian or not. You give a balanced argument.
Ben, United Kingdom
I am constantly blessed & inspired by reading the Daily Recharge.
Thankyou Mal for being a faithful mouthpiece for God and being willing to pay the price that is necessary if one is going to minister life!
John, Australia
Send us your feedback |
|
